Проаналізовані норми державного законодавства та практичні аспекти реалізації інституту присяги у публічному просторі та у сфері матеріального права на землях Правобережної України у ХV – першій половині ХVІІ ст. Доведено, що присяга реалізовувала ідею публічності в українському суспільно-правовому житті, а процедура присягання була самостійним видом доказу у цивільному судочинстві.
Проанализированы нормы государственного законодательства и практические аспекты реализации института присяги в публичном пространстве и сфере материального права на землях Правобережной Украины в ХV – первой половине ХVІІ вв. Доказано, что присяга реализовывала идею публичности в украинском общественно-правовой жизни, а процедура присягания была самостоятельным видом доказательства в гражданском судопроизводстве.
Analyzed the rules of public law and practical aspects of the Institute oath in public space and in the substantive law on Right-bank Ukraine in the XV – the first half of the seventeenth century. The historic nature of the oath is rooted in
the sacred rite that has provided the relevant rights and obligations of value, combining legal and moral responsibility. Oath of the lithuanian-ruthenian law was used as a verification method lawfully acquired property as legal action aimed at the establishment owner, in fixing the amount of movable and immovable property. Procedure oath was a prerequisite stage of proceedings and legal actions, implementing regulations regulatory privileges, deals with material obligations, sanctions.
It is proved that the oath implemented the idea of publicity ukrainian in public life, and swear procedure was independent view of evidence in civil proceedings. Procedure swear regulate complex civil relations in the middle of society, solving conflicts. On the basis of legal regulations and assembly material found swear that the procedure had great moral and legal force. Oath certifies the existence of a legal instrument, which in turn serve as the basis for the next phase of the executive or judicial proceedings. The procedure was then swear tool legalization as judicial and administrative decisions.
Institute oath in public life served as legal regulatory mechanism, the use of which ensures sustainable functioning of basic social subsystems and led to the solution of existing contradictions in the legal plane. The wide use oath in public social space as an important procedure justice and effective mechanism for implementation and protection of the rights and status of material vividly describes the features of the socio-economic structure of ukrainian lands fundamental features of which were eligible for financial private ownership and public defenses of property.
