История контент-анализа: версии и безмолвствующие импликации

dc.contributor.author	Осин, В.
dc.date.accessioned	2010-02-04T12:35:55Z
dc.date.available	2010-02-04T12:35:55Z
dc.date.issued	2008
dc.identifier.citation	История контент-анализа: версии и безмолвствующие импликации / В. Осин // Ейдос. Альманах теорії та історії історичної науки. — К., 2008. — Вип. 3. — С. 252-283. — рос.	uk_UA
dc.identifier.uri	http://dspace.nbuv.gov.ua/handle/123456789/5748
dc.description.abstract	The status of content analysis in modern scientific discourse is practically indisputable. It is here that the danger is hidden: being in the beginning easy to identify and undoubtedly new m ethod, in future content analysis seized to be both purely quantitative and exceptionally modern: the number of its variations is countless and its main elements can be found as far back as ancient times. Thus, the determination of the degree of scientific validity of content analysis in contemporary circumstances presupposes the deconstruction of its practice of history -writing as the first step. It must help to find out the actual factors that have made content analysis the established scientific method.	uk_UA
dc.language.iso	ru	uk_UA
dc.publisher	Інститут історії України НАН України	uk_UA
dc.subject	Методологiя: історiя i практики	uk_UA
dc.title	История контент-анализа: версии и безмолвствующие импликации	uk_UA
dc.title.alternative	History of content analysis: some versions and speechless implications	uk_UA
dc.type	Article	uk_UA
dc.status	published earlier	uk_UA