Відкликання представника у теорії та практиці народного представництва

Abstract

У статті досліджено сутність поняття «відкликання представника» як особливої правової категорії у теорії та практиці народного представництва. Проаналізовано різні підходи до тлумачення поняття та суті відкликання, з’ясовано особливості механізму його реалізації на практиці. Автором сформульовано власне бачення ризиків та доцільності використання зазначеного правового інституту на практиці в умовах сучасного розвитку суспільства.

В статье исследовано сущность понятия «отзыв представителя» как особенной правовой категории в теории и практике народного представительства. Проанализированы разные подходи к толкованию понятия и сущности отзыва, выяснены особенности механизма его реализации на практике. Автором сформулировано собственное виденье рисков и целесообразности использования отмеченного правового института на практике в условиях современного развития общества.

In the article the essence of concept «recall of representative» as a special legal category in a theory and practice of folk representative office is investigated. It is analysed different ways of interpretation of concept and essence of the recall, the features of the mechanism of its realization in practice are found out. An author has formulated her own vision of risks and expedience of the use of this legal institute in practice in conditions of modern development of the society. The improvement of the practice of folk representative office functioning in the modern state predetermines the necessity of decision of row of related to its state creative problems. One of the most debatable is a problem of recall of folk representative, which is related above all things, with ambiguous interpretation of concept and essence of the recall, to the mechanism of his realization in practice. In theoretical and practical aspects of question of recall of representative it was and remain the object of scientific study of foreign and domestic research workers, in particular S. Avak’yana, E. Berka, N. Vaganovoy, V. Zhuravskogo, E. Kurmanova, O. Malka, N. Nikiforovoy, N. Petrovoy, O. Radchenka, V. Rudenka, V. Sinyukova and others. In that time the problem of recall of representative does not lose the actuality and needs continuation of the special scientific analysis. Taking into account it, consider a necessity to consider the noted problem more detailed. There are different decisions of concept «recall» in scientific literature. Thus, the recall of the representative can be examined in different values. According to different conceptions the recall can be examined as a component element of institute of imperative mandate and as an independent institute of the law. In this context extraordinarily interesting is a question of recall in the foreign states. A recall is an extreme display of imperative mandate, but this institute exists also if the elective person has a free mandate. A mechanism of realization of the recall of representative in practice is sufficiently difficult, that is bound with the contradictory understanding of essence and setting of recall. The ambiguous is seemed by understanding of grounds of recall of representative. Except for that, incomprehensible criteria and subjects of estimation of the proper acts of representative. As a result, subjectivism in understanding of this problem generates substantial complications in the process of realization of recall in practice. Summarizing the above-mentioned, it follows to accede to the idea about unefficiency of recall as a result of scale and obviously uncommensurable organizationally financial, material and technical, social and political, morally psychological problems which arise up at a necessity the use of this measure. Actually that is why, the recall of representative seems inwardly contradictory and doubtful enough in a political plan, that and it is needed to take into account at perfection practices of folk representative office in the modern terms of creation of the state.