dc.description.abstract |
The article is devoted to research features of law in their dealings with the principles of law. Substantiated that the experience of building the rule of law in Ukraine led to the transition from of understanding the dynamic functions of law, that is, from one-sided (command) to the dummy (social value) the nature of law. Therefore it is appropriate to call the legal function double definition (e.g. organizational and integrative function — organizational and integrative) as a function component reflects its stability, the other — the dynamics, variability according to the social and legal development. The author refers to the analysis of the term «function» in general and legal science, in particular, and concludes that the concept of «function of law» includes philosophical and legal, general and partly legal interpretation. Available functions of law as objectively defined the main directions of its impact (including activities), which express the nature, purpose, role and place of law in society. Distinguished features classification criteria for subjects, objects, methods, means and forms of implementation, according to which the distinguished national functions (political, social, economic, cultural, ideological, ecological, etc.), certain types of functions, including power ( legislative, executive, judicial), major (political, economic, financial, cultural, ideological) and additional (informative, integrative, predictive, software), external and internal functions of the state. It is alleged that the functions of law are implemented through the law, including by industry, institutions, regulations, contracts, precedents, by acts of law as well as by the activities of public authorities. It determines the developed concept of understanding the functions based on the separation of law and legal categories «Legalism», «yusnaturalizm», «legal libertarizm» and established a category of «legal reality». |
uk_UA |