Показати простий запис статті
dc.contributor.author |
Giordano, C. |
|
dc.date.accessioned |
2021-12-11T19:14:23Z |
|
dc.date.available |
2021-12-11T19:14:23Z |
|
dc.date.issued |
2017 |
|
dc.identifier.citation |
Europe: core, peripheries and postcolonial relations / C. Giordano // Социология: теория, методы, маркетинг. — 2017. — № 1. — С. 175-187. — англ. |
uk_UA |
dc.identifier.issn |
1563-4426 |
|
dc.identifier.uri |
http://dspace.nbuv.gov.ua/handle/123456789/182071 |
|
dc.description.abstract |
Most concepts of Europe as a unitary community are characterised by a bipolar scheme where the notion of Europe appears together with contrastive representations of an “anti-Europe” (Arab-Muslim culture, Asia, the Orient, Africa, etc.). There is a mirrored reflective relationship by which the former’s basic traits are identified through a presumed diametrical opposition with the latter’s. However, it is misleading to think of Europe as a united civilisation, or even worse, as a sum of cultural areas. As suggested by a Hungarian historianJeno Szucs, a French historian Fernand Braudel and an American sociologist Immanuel Wallerstein, Europe must be considered as a system of strictly (inter)dependent yet structurally diverse “historical regions”. The rise of the capitalist “world-system” and the emergence of a new international division of labour transformed those regions into core, peripheries and marginal external areas. |
uk_UA |
dc.language.iso |
en |
uk_UA |
dc.publisher |
Iнститут соціології НАН України |
uk_UA |
dc.relation.ispartof |
Социология: теория, методы, маркетинг |
|
dc.subject |
Статьи |
uk_UA |
dc.title |
Europe: core, peripheries and postcolonial relations |
uk_UA |
dc.type |
Article |
uk_UA |
dc.status |
published earlier |
uk_UA |
dc.identifier.udc |
930.85 |
|
Файли у цій статті
Ця стаття з'являється у наступних колекціях
Показати простий запис статті