В статье проанализирован конфликт в украинской культуре через призму опыта
теоретического прочтения идей Хантингтона. Выявлены ключевые факторы культурного конфликта:
лингвистический и религиозный. Проанализирована проблема «переопределения цивилизационной
идентичности», выявлены основные стадии в эволюционном процессе переопределения. Предложена
культурологическая модель происходящих процессов в современной украинской культуре. Модель
представляет собой описание культурного процесса в контексте центростремительных и
центробежных тенденций – поочередно сменяющихся траекторий движений.
У статті проаналізовано конфлікт в українській культурі через призму досвіду
теоретичного прочитання ідей Хантінтона. Виявлено ключові фактори культурного конфлікту:
лінгвістичний та релігійний. Проаналізовано проблему «перевизначення цивілізаційної ідентичності»,
виявлено основні стадії в еволюційному процесі перевизначення. Запропоновано культурологічна модель
процесів, що відбуваються в сучасній українській культурі. Модель являє собою опис культурного
процесу в контексті доцентрових і відцентрових тенденцій - по черзі змінюваних траєкторій рухів.
In article analyzed the conflict in Ukrainian culture through the prism of experience theoretical ideas
by S. Hantington
Ukrainian culture analyzed on the borders of collision of the Eurasian and Western cultures. Revealed that the
fault line cultures the information era and is conditional geographical, has rather diffuse character, does not
have clear expressed borders.
Language is the determining factor of belonging to the culture this or that rod of civilization. Semiosphere
related with geopolitical zones influences and crucial in matters of cultural identification. Is substantiated
affirmative of power through semiosphere which is to create a valuable sense, their management and collision.
The types of a divided and torned country that allocates Huntington identified stadial and historical character of
types, their sequence in the process of overriding civilizational identity.
Examined the process and conditions override civilizational identity, that indicated by Huntington.
Analyzed the religious factor a clash of civilizations in the territory of the Ukrainian state, which manifests itself
in opposition to the Catholic and Orthodox branches of Christianity, moving aside and so shifting the frontier a
line zone of influence the European Catholic historically for its limits.
Proposed culturological model the processes taking place in the modern Ukrainian culture.
The model is a description of the cultural process in the context of centrifugal and centripetal tendencies -
alternately of changing trajectories of movements, such as the movement to the center, when there is a
concentration of cultures around the center of empire, and the movement from the center in which drop occursdisintegrates
empire, into separate states or movement to another, stronger center more.
The author suggests that Ukrainian culture is not only on the fracture civilizations, but also is on the path of
movement is gaining strength around the new civilization ("rod" in Samuel Huntington's) center, its specific part
is modeled here in engaging cultural process.
Analyzed three options conflict resolution clash of civilizations, shows the role of pivotal countries participating
in its permission proposed by Huntington.
Revealed that the aggregate of all conditions of the conflict of cultures is a moment of transition to such a new
qualitative state, which is characterized by a point of bifurcation, which culture assumes potential scenarios of
its development.
Cultural genesis identified potential scenarios that implicitly folded at the bifurcation point. Unfolding of a
script, according to the author, is an important historical and axiological choice, which should take into account
the diversity and specificity of cultural regions in the territory of Ukraine.
Identified the main traits Russian and Western world.
